An Interesting Take on Artificial Intelligence from the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints

The Church recently put out this really fascinating video, discussing the rise and impact of artificial intelligence from a religious perspective, and detailing some practical guidelines for how and how not to use the new technology. Elder Gong is a member of the Quorum of the Twelve Apostles, the second highest governing body in the Church beneath the First Presidency. If you’re interested in AI, it’s worth watching, even if you’re not a member of the LDS church.

The biggest practical takeaway I took from this is that AI should not be the first thing you do, or the last thing you do. He was specifically talking about preparing church talks and Sunday school lessons, but I think it applies just as well to writing. If you start your story by having AI come up with the outline, it will never truly be your project, because it lacks your vision in its bones. Similarly, if you run the final draft through some AI tools and blindly accept all changes, it’s going to smother out your voice.

Interesting stuff. Worth giving a listen.

Finishing up The Unknown Sea soon

I’ve been making good progress on The Unknown Sea, and now expect to finish it before the end of June—which surprises me, because before I passed the 2/3rds mark on the rough human draft, the numbers simply didn’t add up. But they do now, so I think there’s a very good chance I’ll have the final draft finished by the end of next week, and ready to send off to my editor. Here is where everything is currently at:

  • Final polished draft: 47%
  • Revised human draft: 54%
  • Rough human draft: 67%
  • Final AI draft: 84%

I’ve written enough books to notice this pattern: that whenever I’m between the 35% and 65% marks, it feels like the book is taking longer than it should to write. The numbers don’t just add up, and every day, it feels like I’m falling further behind. But then, around the 2/3rds mark, things turn around, and suddenly I’m in a sprint to the finish, with everything falling into place quite nicely. Which just goes to show you that the way to climb a mountain is to take one step at a time, and the way to eat an elephant is to do it one bite at a time.

We’ve got a lot going on this next week, with family in town, but I think I can carve out enough time to make good progress on this book. Which means I need to get to work now, but I’l leave you with this flash sale I’m currently running on the Sea Mage Cycle, exclusive to my online store. For the next week, Omnibus I is available for just $4.99. That’s four books for the price of one, in the same series as The Unknown Sea. Check it out!


This omnibus edition contains the first four books of the Sea Mage Cycle:

RESCUER’S REWARD
All Jason ever wanted was to sail the Azure Sea as a merchant ship’s captain. But money problems have him up to his eyeballs in debt, and if he doesn’t return to port with the gold, his dreams will be dashed forever. So when the princess of a far-off kingdom is kidnapped by pirates en route to her wedding, Jason merrily takes up the chase, staking his future on the reward for her safe return.

THE WIDOW’S CHILD
Elara left everything behind to raise her magically gifted daughter in the isolated safety of a lonely homestead. But they can’t stay hidden forever, and it’s only a matter of time before evil men find them and seek to exploit her daughter’s gifts. To find someone to help her, Elara must open her heart, even if it means risking everything she has sacrificed and worked for.

THE WINDS OF DESOLATION
All Alex ever wanted was to be a sea mage like his father. But though he is gifted with magic, the wind and the waves refuse to answer his call. So when a storm shipwrecks his crew on the barren shores of the Lands of Desolation, Alex must unravel the dark mysteries of this forsaken land, discovering its connection with his own latent powers. But will Alex master the magic within him before the curse upon the land consumes them all?

THE CALL OF THE TIDE
After dropping out of the King’s Fleet, Samuel didn’t think he would amount to much. But when an ancient and secretive cult comes after him, he learns that his particular kind of magic set him apart. An ancient artifact known as the Tidecaller’s Amulet is the key to unlocking a great evil, and Samuel is one of only a few people who can use it—or destroy it. With the help of a flamboyant privateer captain, he sets out to find the ancient artifact before it—or he—falls into the wrong hands.

New Sons of the Starfarers Covers!

Ever since I got the pro version of ChatGPT (and/or the AWESOME Patron Toolbox over at Author Media), I’ve been sloooooowly going through my backlist, updating blurbs, covers, and metadata. One of my old series that really needs new covers is Sons of the Starfarers. Check out these new ones!

These will hopefully go up over the next week or so. Next up: the Genesis Earth Trilogy!

Is What Hard Times Hath Wrought For You?

What Hard Times Hath Wrought is a post-apocalyptic survival story about grief, family, faith, and the hard transfer of responsibility from one generation to the next. It delivers a tense, intimate road story through a collapsing America, where the greatest danger is not only hunger, fuel, disease, or bandits, but the fear that the people you love may not be strong enough for the world they are inheriting.

What Kind of Reader Will Love This Book?

For readers who enjoy character-driven post-apocalyptic fiction, survival stories about ordinary families, and near-future collapse scenarios grounded in social and generational anxieties, What Hard Times Hath Wrought is probably your kind of story.

You may especially love it if you like:

  • Post-apocalyptic road stories where survival depends on family, grit, and practical competence
  • Near-future collapse fiction with a realistic, grounded, rural American setting
  • Stories about grief, responsibility, adoption, forgiveness, and found family under pressure
  • Hopeful survival fiction where faith and moral courage matter as much as weapons or supplies
  • Generational stories about young people rising to meet hard times when the old world falls apart

What You’ll Find Inside

What Hard Times Hath Wrought follows Mia, a widowed stepmother and guardian, as she leads her teenage stepdaughter Lily and nephew Caleb away from a failed farm and toward the Rockies in search of safety after America’s slow collapse. Along the way, the story explores grief, family secrets, young love, pregnancy in a broken world, the burden of leadership, and the painful necessity of trusting the next generation. The result is a tense but hopeful post-apocalyptic novelette: rugged, intimate, emotionally grounded, and quietly heroic.

What Makes It Different

Fans of The Road, Station Eleven, or classic survivalist post-apocalyptic fiction will recognize the lonely roads, scarce supplies, broken infrastructure, and constant moral pressure of a world coming apart. But What Hard Times Hath Wrought takes those familiar collapse-fiction elements in a more family-centered and generational direction. Where many post-apocalyptic stories focus on lone wanderers, grim violence, or nihilistic despair, this one leans into kinship, moral formation, faith, and the question of whether hard times can forge people strong enough to rebuild. It is less about the spectacle of civilization falling and more about the intimate moment when a mother figure realizes she can no longer carry the whole world herself.

What You Won’t Find

If you’re looking for grimdark cynicism, explicit romance, or a sprawling action-heavy apocalypse epic, this probably isn’t that kind of story. The danger is real, and the world is harsh, but the emotional center is hopeful, familial, and morally serious. If you would rather read about courage, sacrifice, faith, and young people stepping into responsibility, you’ll feel much more at home here.

Why I Think You Might Love It

I think this story matters because it asks a question that feels increasingly urgent: what kind of people will inherit the world after the old systems fail? The author’s note makes clear that the story grew out of concerns about collapse, generational stagnation, and the population crisis, but the heart of the story is smaller and more human than any theory of history. It is about a woman who has carried too much for too long, a young man who needs to become worthy of the future, and a young woman whose unborn child turns survival into something more than mere endurance. In the end, What Hard Times Hath Wrought is a story about broken things repaired with courage—and about finding hope precisely when the world seems least able to offer it.

Where To Get It

Related Posts and Pages

Explore my other standalone books here.

Return to the book page for Lord of the Slaves.

How I Approach the Problem of Evil As a Believing Latter-day Saint

The other day, it occured to me that it might be really interesting to write a series of blog posts where I explained how, as a believing member of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, I approach various faith issues and questions. After all, I’ve wrestled with just about every reason people cite for leaving the faith, both the ones specific to the Church like polygamy, blacks and the priesthood, Book of Mormon historicity issues, etc, as well as the broader issues that make people lose their faith in God generally. I’ve heard almost all of them, genuinely wrestled with most of them, and after all of that, I am still very much a believer.

So to start this series off, I wanted to tackle what is, perhaps, the biggest reason why people lose faith in God: theodicy, or the problem of evil. Some people formulate it as “why do bad things happen to good people?” but it’s actually much deeper than that, and cuts to the very core of faith and religion generally. The way that I prefer to formulate it is: “how can evil exist if there is an all-powerful God who loves us?”

The Holistic Approach

First, I have to say that the best take I’ve ever read on this issue is found in the Book of Job. It’s kind of a difficult read, especially in the KJV, because so much is lost in translation. The best commentary on the Book of Job that I’ve read is Rereading Job: Understanding the Ancient World’s Greatest Poem by Michael Austin. I’m not sure I agree with everything in that book, but it did make me completely rethink a lot of things I thought I knew.

The TL;DR of the Book of Job is basically this: we will probably never fully know, in this life, why God permits evil to exist—and that’s kind of the point. We just have to struggle with it. And we must have compassion for those who are struggling with this, and not judge them harshly like Job’s comforters did.

If I were talking to a friend who was struggling with the problem of evil because they were going through a seriously difficult time in their life, I would not try to give them an intellectual answer, or debate philosophy, or anything like that. Instead, I would say something like “I feel you. That really sucks. I’m sorry.” And I would try to do everything I could to comfort them and make it easier.

I’ve lead a pretty charmed life. I’ve never been in combat. I’ve never buried a child. I’ve never been raped or abused. Of course, I’ve experienced pain and heartbreak, but only about as much as I need to say that I’ve had a full life. All things considered, I’ve never really experienced the kind of evil that would make me question the existence of God.

I sincerely hope that if I did experience that kind of evil, I would have the faith to struggle through it, believing that something good would come of that struggle. I hope that I would hold to that faith, even if it turned out that the good would never come until after this mortal life. But maybe I wouldn’t. Maybe I would rail against God. Maybe I would lose my faith for a season.

So I can’t really judge people who do. At the end of the day, all I can really do is “mourn with those who mourn, and comfort those who stand in need of comfort.” (Mosiah 18:9) That’s much more important than trying to give a philosophical or theological answer to this problem.

The Intellectual Approach

But a lot of people who lose faith over this issue don’t lose it over what they’re suffering, but over what they see other people suffering, or over the idea of what they might suffer. So laying aside the holistic approach, here is how I approach the problem of evil on an intellectual and/or philosophical level.

If you formulate the problem of evil as a syllogism, it looks something like this:

  1. Evil cannot exist if there is an all-powerful God who loves us.
  2. Evil exists.
  3. Therefore, either:
    • A) there is no God, or
    • B) God does not love us, or
    • C) God is not all-powerful.

The traditional way most Christians attack this problem is by challenging point 2. What we perceive as evil is not actually evil, because God has a way of turning evil for good. In the fulness of time, we will see that everything in this world really works out for the best. We just need to have faith.

That argument became really difficult to make after all of the horrors and atrocities and genocides of the 20th century, especially the Nazi holocaust. For that reason, I don’t really buy it, though I do think there’s something to be said about the fact that the evil and suffering of this life are ultimately temporary, since all things in this mortal coil will ultimately pass away. More on that later.

As a believing Latter-day Saint, I think the better approach is to challenge point 1 and point 3C. Where most other Christians (especially Calvinists) assume that God is arbitrarily all-powerful, we understand that God is constrained by certain eternal laws, and that if God were to violate those eternal laws, he would “cease to be God.” (Alma 42:13, Mormon 9:19)

Personally, I reject the idea that God is the “unmoved mover,” or a being “without body, parts, or passions.” On the most basic level, I believe that God is a person, much like any of us—that when the Bible says that Moses spoke with God “face to face, as a man speaketh unto his friend” (Exodus 33:11), there’s something literal in that. Laying aside the question of whether Moses literally saw the face of God, what that verse really says is that God is the kind of person you can have a conversation with.

Furthermore, I believe that there is something literal in the phrase “Heavenly Father.” In other words, I believe that all of humanity is the literal offspring of God—that as premortal spirits, we were all born to heavenly parents before we came down here to Earth. Furthermore, I believe that God was once a mortal man like us, and that His ultimate hope for us is that we grow up and become like Him, same as any parent hopes for their children.

This is a theology that is unique to Latter-day Saints, and it gives us a very different take on the problem of evil. Because the only way for us to become like God and receive our exaltation is for all of us to come to this Earth and exercise our agency to choose good or evil. But because many of us choose evil, that brings evil into the world, and God cannot intervene to stop that, because agency is an eternal principle that God cannot violate.

But what God can do—and does do—is send His Son, Jesus Christ, to redeem us from from death and hell, and to make all things new. Jesus Christ saves us from death, because He has power over death. Because of Him, all of us will be resurrected and receive an immortal body, regardless of our choices in this life. He also saves us from sin, by His suffering and atonement in Gethsemane and on the cross. As a sinless man, He paid the ultimate price to settle the cosmic scales, not just for those who repent, but for everyone. His atonement is truly infinite.

Through His atonement, Christ also vicariously suffered all of our pains and afflictions—the evils that we experience in this life, not as a result of any sin or wrongdoing on our own part, but simply by the fact that we live in a fallen world. Because of this, He understands and can empathize with everything we go through. And through His power, all things can—and will—be made new. He is the Alpha and the Omega, the Beginning and the End.

This is how I approach the problem of evil as a believing Latter-day Saint. Evil exists because of human agency, which God had given us because He loves us and wants us to become like Him. But ultimately, because of Christ, all evil will pass away. If we accept Christ and become His disciples, our suffering will “give [us] experience, and shall be for [our] good,” because Christ has “descended below them all.” (D&C 122:7-8)

So how can evil exist if there is an all-powerful God who loves us? Because “God so loved the world that He gave His Only Begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life. For God sent not his Son into the world to condemn the world; but that the world through him might be saved.” (John 3:16-17)

I hope you enjoyed reading my thoughts on that matter. Next week, I’ll tackle an issue that’s more specific to us Latter-day Saints: the question of blacks and the priesthood. My recent thoughts on the subject have made me reconsider a lot of my views, not just about my faith, but about racism, religion, and American history generally. So whether or not you’re a Latter-day Saint, I think you’ll find it interesting.

Author’s Note: Captive of the Falconstar

This is the author’s note I wrote for Captive of the Falconstar. To preorder the novel, click here.

As a young reader, I noticed an interesting pattern in the science fiction books I used to read. Whenever there were three books in a trilogy, the first one was usually a standalone of sorts, with a straightforward plot arc and a satisfying conclusion. But the second book in the trilogy either ended in a major cliffhanger, or else followed a tragic arc with a very unsatisfying conclusion that set things up for the third and final book in the trilogy, which wraps things up in a much more satisfying way. Over time, I internalized this basic rhythm, and still keep it in mind whenever I outline a new series arc.

With the Falconstar Trilogy, I had the idea for the first book long before I knew where the series itself was going. But I found it very difficult to write Queen of the Falconstar until I knew how the rest of the trilogy would end. For that reason, Queen of the Falconstar remained an unfinished draft on my hard drive for the better part of a decade, until I dusted it off in 2020 and tried to rewrite it as a novella. After running it through my writing group, I had a long conversation with my wife, in which I shared some of my story ideas for books 2 and 3. Her response was the catalyst that became Captive of the Falconstar: she basically said “Sonya is too much of a passive character. You should make her the villain/anti-hero of book 2, and give her a revenge plot.”

Suddenly, everything came together, and I knew exactly what I needed to do. I scrapped the novella version of Queen of the Falconstar and turned it into a novel, publishing it in 2021. I then set the Falconstar Trilogy aside to finish The Stars of Redemption (the third book in the Genesis Earth Trilogy) and Children of the Starry Sea. Basically, I had a lot of irons in the fire and wanted to finish those other WIPs before finishing what I’d started with Falconstar. Also, I wanted to see how Queen of the Falconstar did as a standalone, to judge whether or not to prioritize the next two books.

Then, in 2022, OpenAI released ChatGPT and everything began to change. Suddenly, generative AI was turning the writing world upside down. Two camps began to emerge: the first and most vocal was vehemently opposed to all things AI, but especially with using AI as a writing tool. From what I can tell, between a third to a half of all writers fall into that camp. The other half, however, quietly began to implement AI in their writing process in varying degrees. Some writers were lazy about it, leading to some hilarious mishaps when they copy-pasted the full AI response in their books without reading it first, including phrases like “here is the passage you requested, in the style of such-and-such author.” But others were more thoughtful about it, striving to find a balance between using AI as a tool and preserving their own authorial voice and vision.

It was a fascinating time to be a writer, especially one with several novels under my belt. Since I’d already written at least a million words without any AI, and had already developed my own personal voice, I didn’t see much harm in experimenting with these new AI writing tools to see what they could do. I very quickly found that the lazy approach was not the best way to “write,” as AI has, at best, a very bland voice and very little logical consistency over the course of a 300 page book. To really make it work, I found that I had to bring my own vision in the form of a solid outline, and to rewrite everything in my own words to make sure that my voice made it to the final version. But for all the work in-between, I found that AI was a very powerful tool.

There are basically three parts to writing a book: coming up with the story, translating that story idea into words on the page, and turning those words into good words. The part that I struggle the most with is putting the actual words on the page, because a story often changes in the course of writing it down, and when my focus is on putting words on the page, it’s very difficult for me to keep a broad view of the story. Suddenly, the words stop coming to me, because my subconscious mind recognizes that something in the story is broken, but because I’ve lost sight of the forest for the trees, I don’t know how to fix it. So I spend the next month (or two, or three) trying to write my way through the block, only to find that the whole book is hopelessly broken, at which point I decide to set the book aside and come back to it later, once I can approach it with fresh eyes. When I come back to it, the problem is often obvious enough that a quick rewrite can fix it, but by that point I’m several months (or even years) into the project, with very little to show for it. And that is when things work out well—I’ve got plenty of other books that I couldn’t fix, and ended up trunking.

But with AI, I can now translate my outline into a passable rough draft without losing sight of the overall story. By doing this, I can immediately identify all of the major issues with the story, and fix them before they turn into months and months of writer’s block. Of course, the AI draft is too terrible to publish on its own, but that’s no different than any other crappy first draft. So after tweaking the prompts, generating a few different versions of the book, and combining the best parts of each version into a version that’s as good as I can make it with the AI tools alone, I find that I’m ready to rewrite the whole thing in my own words. At that point, it doesn’t matter if I lose sight of the overall story, because all of the major story issues are fixed, and I can focus on the page without having to worry about falling into writer’s block.

In general, I think there are two approaches to using AI. The first is to use AI to do all the work, so that you can reap all of the reward. This isn’t always the wrong approach, but it does always produce “slop.” The other approach is to use AI to do the work that you really struggle with, so that you can refocus your energy on the work that you’re actually good at. Usually, this is the 20% of what you do that produces 80% of the results. Using this approach to AI, you can 5x your productivity without sacrificing quality or producing AI slop.

Imagine a world where instead of waiting a year or more to read the next book from your favorite author, you could get a new book every few months. A world in which your favorite author writes more than a hundred really good books over the course of his lifetime, rather than only one or two dozen. With the way AI is changing things, I’m very optimistic that we are entering this kind of a world. Yes, there will be a lot of slop too, but most of that is going to sink while the cream will rise to the top. And as for the fear that AI will completely replace human authors, I’m not too worried about that, because voice and vision are the two distinctly human elements that make the best books stand out from all the rest. We may get to the point where AI can write a good, generic fantasy novel, but it will never be able to write a Joe Vasicek novel. So if I can learn to use these AI writing tools without losing my voice or my vision for my books, the result is a world where I can write not just more books, but better books—enough to build an audience that will sustain a lifelong career.

So from 2023 through 2025, I focused all of my writing efforts on experimenting with these new AI writing tools, figuring out what worked and what didn’t work, and incorporated all of that into my new creative process. I wrote a lot of practice novels in that time, most of them in the Sea Mage Cycle, but I did experiment a lot with Captive of the Falconstar too. In 2024, I wrote out a detailed outline for the book, but my first attempt was not satisfactory, and I ended up trunking that AI draft and reworking the project from scratch. All through this time, the AI models themselves were rapidly changing, (as well as Sudowrite, the platform I use for most of my AI drafts,) so when I did pick up this WIP again, it made more sense to rewrite the prompts and generate a whole new version anyway.

In January 2026, I decided to buckle down and finish Captive of the Falconstar, even if it took the better part of the year. Thankfully, I managed to finish it in only four months, even though I was watching three small kids for most of that time while my wife was working full-time. (That’s another great thing about writing with these new AI tools: they can really help you to write through difficult life circumstances that would otherwise force you to put your writing on the back-burner for months, or even years.) Once it was done, I sent it off to my editor and put it up for preorder.

The content issues of Captive of the Falconstar did give me pause, since this is much more of an R-rated book than I usually write. In particular, I spent a lot of time agonizing over whether to fade to black instead of including the explicit sex scene where [SPOILER REDACTED]. But her realization of [SPOILER REDACTED] was important enough to her character development that I decided to keep it in. And whenever I paused for a gut check, I always got the impression that this was the book I was supposed to write, even with the explicit sexual content.

Zenoba’s bisexuality was also difficult to write, because of the danger that it would upset everybody and satisfy nobody: that LGBTQ readers would be outraged by the lack of positive affirmation, and that conservative readers would be disgusted by the inclusion of any LGBTQ content at all. But [SPOILER REDACTED] is so key to Zenoba’s character, and to [SPOILER REDACTED], that I couldn’t write her character honestly without including it. And again, whenever I paused for a gut check, I always felt impressed to go on. For all that, I can only suppose that there is a reader out there whom this story was meant to touch. Perhaps that reader is you.

When it comes to mature subjects like [SPOILER REDACTED], there’s a fine line between depicting the subject honestly and depicting it gratuitously. If you err too far on one side, you end up with a weak or an incomplete story, but if you err too far on the other, you veer into writing porn. I’ve done my best to thread that line, and to write my characters as true and as honestly as possible. Perhaps I could have done better, but I do believe that I’ve done the best that I can with my current level of skill.

My plan as of now is to finish another Sea Mage Cycle book and write the third and final book in the Falconstar Trilogy in time for a May 2027 release. I’m still not at a point where I can write a new book in less than 3-4 months, but I do think I can write them fast enough to publish 2-3 novels per year. So that’s the goal. Maybe when the kids are a little older, and I’m a little more practiced with these AI writing tools, I’ll be able to to do more than that. But either way, you won’t have to wait another five years before getting the conclusion to the Falconstar Trilogy. That much I can definitely promise you!

If you enjoyed this book, I would greatly appreciate it if you would post a rating or a review. It really does help to train the recommendation algorithms, so that other people with similar tastes can find these books. Or you can tell a friend about them—even in today’s interconnected world, there’s no substitute for an authentic human connection. If you want to follow my books and my writing, the best way to do that is to sign up for my email newsletter, which I send out about 1-2 times per month. Or you can follow my blog at One Thousand and One Parsecs, or email me at jvasicek.author@gmail.com if you want to get in touch.

That’s all for this one. Until next time, thanks for reading!

Joe

June 2026

HTTL

Plugging along

Just plugging along with my current WIP, The Unknown Sea. As of right now, I’m 28% done with the final polished draft, 32% done with the revised human draft, 46% done with the rough human draft, and 73% done with the final AI draft (the rough AI draft is already complete).

I’m cycling through all of these drafts at the same time, which is why each one is at a different stage. It’s an experiment to see if that’s a better way to write, as opposed to working on the one draft until it’s completely done, then reworking the whole book until the next draft is done, etc.

The important number is the 28% of the final polished draft, which marks the end of the writing stage. Once that’s done, I’ll send it off to my editor, accept/reject his edits, and then put it in the publishing queue. The preorder is already up at most ebookstores, but I still have to upload the final version by December, which shouldn’t be a problem as I expect to have a finished book by August or September at the latest.

So that’s what I’ve been up to. My wife’s birthday/anniversary is coming up, too—we were married on her birthday, so I’d better not forget it! But since both days are the same day, I don’t think I ever will. Then again, I’ve become a lot more forgetful the older I become. Half the toys our kids own, I have no idea where they came from or how they got here. Is that normal?

In any case, that’s what I’ve been up to. Back to writing!

A more accurate picture of the dating market

Saw this in my recommends and found it fascinating. I’m currently happily married and not on the dating market at all, but I’ve got friends and family who are, so I like to keep an eye on it. And from some of the black-pilled manosphere content makes me feel like I got out on the last AC-130 out of Kabul, getting married just before the coronapocalypse. So it was good to see something a lot more reasonable and nuanced.