An Interesting Take on Artificial Intelligence from the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints

The Church recently put out this really fascinating video, discussing the rise and impact of artificial intelligence from a religious perspective, and detailing some practical guidelines for how and how not to use the new technology. Elder Gong is a member of the Quorum of the Twelve Apostles, the second highest governing body in the Church beneath the First Presidency. If you’re interested in AI, it’s worth watching, even if you’re not a member of the LDS church.

The biggest practical takeaway I took from this is that AI should not be the first thing you do, or the last thing you do. He was specifically talking about preparing church talks and Sunday school lessons, but I think it applies just as well to writing. If you start your story by having AI come up with the outline, it will never truly be your project, because it lacks your vision in its bones. Similarly, if you run the final draft through some AI tools and blindly accept all changes, it’s going to smother out your voice.

Interesting stuff. Worth giving a listen.

How I Approach the Problem of Evil As a Believing Latter-day Saint

The other day, it occured to me that it might be really interesting to write a series of blog posts where I explained how, as a believing member of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, I approach various faith issues and questions. After all, I’ve wrestled with just about every reason people cite for leaving the faith, both the ones specific to the Church like polygamy, blacks and the priesthood, Book of Mormon historicity issues, etc, as well as the broader issues that make people lose their faith in God generally. I’ve heard almost all of them, genuinely wrestled with most of them, and after all of that, I am still very much a believer.

So to start this series off, I wanted to tackle what is, perhaps, the biggest reason why people lose faith in God: theodicy, or the problem of evil. Some people formulate it as “why do bad things happen to good people?” but it’s actually much deeper than that, and cuts to the very core of faith and religion generally. The way that I prefer to formulate it is: “how can evil exist if there is an all-powerful God who loves us?”

The Holistic Approach

First, I have to say that the best take I’ve ever read on this issue is found in the Book of Job. It’s kind of a difficult read, especially in the KJV, because so much is lost in translation. The best commentary on the Book of Job that I’ve read is Rereading Job: Understanding the Ancient World’s Greatest Poem by Michael Austin. I’m not sure I agree with everything in that book, but it did make me completely rethink a lot of things I thought I knew.

The TL;DR of the Book of Job is basically this: we will probably never fully know, in this life, why God permits evil to exist—and that’s kind of the point. We just have to struggle with it. And we must have compassion for those who are struggling with this, and not judge them harshly like Job’s comforters did.

If I were talking to a friend who was struggling with the problem of evil because they were going through a seriously difficult time in their life, I would not try to give them an intellectual answer, or debate philosophy, or anything like that. Instead, I would say something like “I feel you. That really sucks. I’m sorry.” And I would try to do everything I could to comfort them and make it easier.

I’ve lead a pretty charmed life. I’ve never been in combat. I’ve never buried a child. I’ve never been raped or abused. Of course, I’ve experienced pain and heartbreak, but only about as much as I need to say that I’ve had a full life. All things considered, I’ve never really experienced the kind of evil that would make me question the existence of God.

I sincerely hope that if I did experience that kind of evil, I would have the faith to struggle through it, believing that something good would come of that struggle. I hope that I would hold to that faith, even if it turned out that the good would never come until after this mortal life. But maybe I wouldn’t. Maybe I would rail against God. Maybe I would lose my faith for a season.

So I can’t really judge people who do. At the end of the day, all I can really do is “mourn with those who mourn, and comfort those who stand in need of comfort.” (Mosiah 18:9) That’s much more important than trying to give a philosophical or theological answer to this problem.

The Intellectual Approach

But a lot of people who lose faith over this issue don’t lose it over what they’re suffering, but over what they see other people suffering, or over the idea of what they might suffer. So laying aside the holistic approach, here is how I approach the problem of evil on an intellectual and/or philosophical level.

If you formulate the problem of evil as a syllogism, it looks something like this:

  1. Evil cannot exist if there is an all-powerful God who loves us.
  2. Evil exists.
  3. Therefore, either:
    • A) there is no God, or
    • B) God does not love us, or
    • C) God is not all-powerful.

The traditional way most Christians attack this problem is by challenging point 2. What we perceive as evil is not actually evil, because God has a way of turning evil for good. In the fulness of time, we will see that everything in this world really works out for the best. We just need to have faith.

That argument became really difficult to make after all of the horrors and atrocities and genocides of the 20th century, especially the Nazi holocaust. For that reason, I don’t really buy it, though I do think there’s something to be said about the fact that the evil and suffering of this life are ultimately temporary, since all things in this mortal coil will ultimately pass away. More on that later.

As a believing Latter-day Saint, I think the better approach is to challenge point 1 and point 3C. Where most other Christians (especially Calvinists) assume that God is arbitrarily all-powerful, we understand that God is constrained by certain eternal laws, and that if God were to violate those eternal laws, he would “cease to be God.” (Alma 42:13, Mormon 9:19)

Personally, I reject the idea that God is the “unmoved mover,” or a being “without body, parts, or passions.” On the most basic level, I believe that God is a person, much like any of us—that when the Bible says that Moses spoke with God “face to face, as a man speaketh unto his friend” (Exodus 33:11), there’s something literal in that. Laying aside the question of whether Moses literally saw the face of God, what that verse really says is that God is the kind of person you can have a conversation with.

Furthermore, I believe that there is something literal in the phrase “Heavenly Father.” In other words, I believe that all of humanity is the literal offspring of God—that as premortal spirits, we were all born to heavenly parents before we came down here to Earth. Furthermore, I believe that God was once a mortal man like us, and that His ultimate hope for us is that we grow up and become like Him, same as any parent hopes for their children.

This is a theology that is unique to Latter-day Saints, and it gives us a very different take on the problem of evil. Because the only way for us to become like God and receive our exaltation is for all of us to come to this Earth and exercise our agency to choose good or evil. But because many of us choose evil, that brings evil into the world, and God cannot intervene to stop that, because agency is an eternal principle that God cannot violate.

But what God can do—and does do—is send His Son, Jesus Christ, to redeem us from from death and hell, and to make all things new. Jesus Christ saves us from death, because He has power over death. Because of Him, all of us will be resurrected and receive an immortal body, regardless of our choices in this life. He also saves us from sin, by His suffering and atonement in Gethsemane and on the cross. As a sinless man, He paid the ultimate price to settle the cosmic scales, not just for those who repent, but for everyone. His atonement is truly infinite.

Through His atonement, Christ also vicariously suffered all of our pains and afflictions—the evils that we experience in this life, not as a result of any sin or wrongdoing on our own part, but simply by the fact that we live in a fallen world. Because of this, He understands and can empathize with everything we go through. And through His power, all things can—and will—be made new. He is the Alpha and the Omega, the Beginning and the End.

This is how I approach the problem of evil as a believing Latter-day Saint. Evil exists because of human agency, which God had given us because He loves us and wants us to become like Him. But ultimately, because of Christ, all evil will pass away. If we accept Christ and become His disciples, our suffering will “give [us] experience, and shall be for [our] good,” because Christ has “descended below them all.” (D&C 122:7-8)

So how can evil exist if there is an all-powerful God who loves us? Because “God so loved the world that He gave His Only Begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life. For God sent not his Son into the world to condemn the world; but that the world through him might be saved.” (John 3:16-17)

I hope you enjoyed reading my thoughts on that matter. Next week, I’ll tackle an issue that’s more specific to us Latter-day Saints: the question of blacks and the priesthood. My recent thoughts on the subject have made me reconsider a lot of my views, not just about my faith, but about racism, religion, and American history generally. So whether or not you’re a Latter-day Saint, I think you’ll find it interesting.

A more accurate picture of the dating market

Saw this in my recommends and found it fascinating. I’m currently happily married and not on the dating market at all, but I’ve got friends and family who are, so I like to keep an eye on it. And from some of the black-pilled manosphere content makes me feel like I got out on the last AC-130 out of Kabul, getting married just before the coronapocalypse. So it was good to see something a lot more reasonable and nuanced.

How the world really works

This interview is two and a half hours long, but it’s worth listening to every minute. It completely blew my mind, and connected a bunch of things I’ve been wondering about—not in a conspiratorial way, where everything has an explanation, but in a way that makes pragmatic sense while also opening up to tons of other questions.

The TL;DW version is this: our world operates a lot like the world of the Dresden Files, with a secret history and world that is invisible to most of the mundane normies. But instead of magic, the hidden world runs on money, power, and influence. And instead of factions like the Fey, the white/red/black vampire courts, or the Denarians, the primary factions are the MIC (military industrial complex), the FIC (financial industrial complex), and the TIC (technology industrial complex). And China, which is the only major nation state that hasn’t been brought under the control of the FIC, TIC, or MIC, thanks to the iron fisted rule of the CCP.

But just like the magical world of the Dresden Files lives in fear that the mundane normies will wake up and turn on them, the people who run the world need to give the rest of us stories that will keep the masses happy and distracted, lest they rise up and ruin their ongoing machinations of power. Because even though any one of us has little to no power, as a group we have far more power than we know. Which is why they try to turn us on each other, with stuff like woke vs. MAGA, liberal vs. conservative, left vs. right, Evangelical vs. Muslim/Mormon/Catholic/whatever. It’s all fake. All divide and conquer.

The way to break the system is to remove their leverage over you. Pay off your mortgage, get out of debt, become self reliant etc. For businesses, it means to run a private company with no long-term debt or publicly traded stock, that runs a reliable profit without having to raise capital from outside sources. On the extreme end, you can opt out of the dollar entirely by going full crypto and moving to a jurisdiction where that isn’t against the law.

Under this view, what’s happening with the Iran War right now is a controlled demolition of the post-WWII world order, and the creation of a new one. Trump is an agent of the FIC, which wants to defeat the MIC by ending the endless wars and bringing peace to Western Asia (what the MIC has gotten us to call the “Middle East.”) Closing the Strait of Hormuz is the mechanism for accomplishing this, which is also in China’s interest, because the MIC is standing in the way of China’s Belt and Road initiative. Once they have destroyed the IRGC and brought Israel out from under the MIC (by ending foreign aid), the MIC will probably accept Ukraine as a consolation prize, turning that into a long-term conflict that will allow them to plunder Europe instead. The new world order will be much more stable, though the US will be much less powerful. But on the bright side, we avert WWIII.

At least, that’s what I got from it. Like I said, it’s a fascinating interview.

Is A Hill on Which to Die For You?

Is A Hill on Which to Die for you?

A Hill on Which to Die is a gritty, violent fantasy story about an aging orc war chief who must decide, again and again, which battles are worth fighting and which hills are worth dying on. It delivers a hard-edged tale of leadership, pride, survival, clan loyalty, and tragic decline, told from inside the brutal moral world of orcs rather than from the viewpoint of the heroes who usually fight them.

What Kind of Reader Will Love This Book?

If you like…

  • Dark, gritty fantasy told from the perspective of monsters, raiders, war chiefs, and morally brutal antiheroes
  • Orc-centered fantasy stories about clan politics, leadership challenges, duels, exile, survival, and tribal loyalty
  • David Gemmell-style heroic fantasy with raw violence, tragic masculinity, battlefield honor, and aging warriors facing their last stand
  • Stories where the central question is not “How do we defeat evil?” but “What is worth sacrificing everything for?”
  • Compact fantasy tales that feel like the seed of a larger epic world, with dwarven ruins, dragons, rival clans, and a rising Witch-King in the background

…then A Hill on Which to Die is probably your kind of story.

What You’ll Find Inside

A Hill on Which to Die follows Garak-Nur, an old orc war chief whose clan is threatened not by battlefield defeat, but by ambition, seduction, pride, and the promise of power from a rising Witch-King. As Garak leads his loyal followers into exile and tries to found the new Black Pine Clan, the story explores leadership under pressure, the cost of pride, the fragility of loyalty, and the brutal logic of a warrior culture built on strength. The result is a fast-moving, grim, muscular fantasy story with tragic weight, savage humor, and the feel of an orcish legend told around a fire.

What Makes It Different

Fans of David Gemmell will recognize the emphasis on aging warriors, violent honor, impossible choices, and the grim dignity of a fighter who knows his end is coming. But A Hill on Which to Die takes those heroic fantasy instincts in a darker and stranger direction by placing them inside an orc clan whose values are brutal, alien, and often horrifying. Where many fantasy stories use orcs as faceless enemies, this one makes an orc war chief the central figure and asks readers to understand his courage, failures, loyalties, and blind spots without pretending that he is good. It is not a clean redemption story; it is a tragic fantasy tale about leadership, decline, and the terrible difference between dying well and living too long in power.

What You Won’t Find

If you’re looking for noblebright fantasy, clean heroism, gentle adventure, or a traditional good-versus-evil quest, this probably isn’t that. This story contains brutal violence, savage orc culture, sexual content, and sexual violence, though it is not written as explicit romance or erotic fantasy. But if you want a grim, compact, character-driven fantasy story that takes monster culture seriously and uses it to explore power, pride, loyalty, and mortality, you’ll feel right at home.

Why I Think You Might Love It

The idea for this story came from a simple question: “Is this the hill on which you want to die?” That question became the spine of Garak-Nur’s entire journey. Every major choice he makes forces him to weigh pride against survival, strength against wisdom, and personal authority against the future of his clan. What makes the story linger is that Garak is not admirable in any simple sense, but he is vivid, forceful, and tragically understandable. He belongs to a violent world, and he cannot escape the logic of that world—but he can still choose where to stand, what to defend, and when the hill before him is finally the right one.

Where To Get It

Related Posts and Pages

Explore my other standalone books here.

Return to the book page for A Hill On Which To Die.

May Reading Recap

Books I Finished

The Infinity Machine by Sebastian Mallaby

Compassion vs. Guilt & Other Essays by Thomas Sowell

(Once again, Amazon demonstrates its racism by removing this title from its affiliate program because it was written by a black conservative!)

Riders of the Dawn by Louis L’Amour

Migrations & Cultures by Thomas Sowell

(Surprisingly, Amazon didn’t block this title from its affiliate program. It must not have threatened their ideological values as much as Sowell’s other titles.)

Ten Arguments for Deleting Your Social Media by Jaron Lanier

After That, the Dark by Andrew Klavan

Literary Theory for Robots by Dennis Yi Tenen

The Broken Gun by Louis L’Amour

Manufacturing Delusion by Buck Sexton

The Made From Scratch Life by Melissa K. Norris

The Meaning of Your Life by Arthur C. Brooks

The Love Language That Matters Most by Gary Chapman and Les & Leslie Parrott

Utah Blaine by Louis L’Amour

Side note: they turned this one into a movie!

Books I DNFed

  • Searching for People and Places of the Bible by Great Courses
  • The Library by Andrew by Pettegree and Arthur der Weduwen
  • Your Second Draft by Alex Kourvo
  • Broken Country by Clare Leslie Hall
  • How I Dare by Janet Evanovich
  • The ADHD Field Guide for Adults by Cate Osborn and Erik Gude
  • Selling Sexy by Lauren Sherman and Chantal Fernandez
  • More Than Words by John Warner
  • Everyday Genius by Nelson Dellis
  • The Camp of the Saints by Jean Raspail