Daily Wire is an anti-Mormon channel now

About a week ago, the Daily Wire posted an article on their site titled “7 Reasons Joseph Smith Was a False Prophet” by Matt Fradd. This article was adapted from some exclusive content on Matt Fradd’s DW channel and released under the Daily Wire banner. Needless to say, it caused quit a commotion among DW’s Latter-day Saint subscribers.

This is not the first time the Daily Wire has shown a surprising degree of antipathy toward the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. About a year ago, Phil Cabot, one of DW’s producers, posted on his personal X account that Mormons aren’t Christians, and got into some heated online arguments about that. A couple months ago, shortly after Matt Fradd joined the Daily Wire as a host, he interviewed Joe Heschmeyer, an anti-Mormon who bizarrely argued that Mormonism is a “species of atheism.” And when the mass shooting at the church in Michigan happened last year, the Daily Wire’s coverage went out of the way to avoid using the full name of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, only editing the article after receiving backlash for it.

But all of these things were relatively minor. Phil Cabot is entitled to express his personal opinions on his own X feed. Matt Fradd can interview whoever he wants on his own show. And lots of news outlets fail to mention the full name of the church, intentionally and otherwise. However, this recent article—which was posted under the Daily Wire banner, not Matt Fradd’s channel—crosses the line. It demonstrates that the Daily Wire, as a company, has chosen to oppose the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints and post openly anti-Mormon content. Which means that if you subscribe to the Daily Wire, your money will fund anti-Mormon content.

Andrew Klavan, my personal favorite Daily Wire host, took some heat for his take on the whole controversy. His response was basically “come on guys, can’t you take a joke?” Which is an incoherent thing to say, considering that the 7 Reasons article wasn’t intended as joke at all. But Klavan’s response makes sense when you realize he saw The Book of Mormon Musical over the weekend, and probably didn’t read Matt Fradd’s article at all. His explanation makes a lot more sense.

With that said, I didn’t cancel my family’s DW membership in a fit of outrage. I canceled it because the Daily Wire has clearly become an anti-Mormon channel, and I simply don’t want my money to fund that sort of content.

The question here for Latter-day Saints is this: is your religion more important to you than your politics, or do your politics come before your religion? This is the position the Daily Wire has placed us in. If you continue to keep your DW membership because you want to support their reporting and their conservative political activism—both of which are very good—know that you are doing so at the expense of your faith.

With all of that said, I actually don’t think it’s stupid of the Daily Wire to do this. With the collapse of the woke left and the ongoing cultural shift toward Christian revival, the next big fight in the culture wars is going to be a relitigation of all the old sectarian divisions within Christianity. Which means that the conservative Christian right is going to need a new enemy to hold them all together. The last time we had a major national revival, that enemy was the Catholics, which is how we ended up with Prohibition and immigration restrictions targeting (among other groups) the Irish and Italians. But all the Christian denominations hate the Mormons, partly out of how they see us as uniquely heretical, and partly because of how threatened they feel because of our church’s success.

The Daily Wire has been struggling a lot recently, and it appears that they are desperate to find a new brand of outrage bait to fill the hole that has been made by the collapse of the woke left. If it’s stupid of them to turn on the Mormons, it’s because they’re doing it too early. But ultimately, this is the cultural direction the conservative right is going to take. The Daily Wire is just ahead of the curve.

That’s why I canceled our DW membership. I encourage all my fellow members of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints to do the same.

Who or what is a “Christian” anyway?

A lot of us members of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints had a rude (and violent) awakening this week to just how much our fellow Christian “friends” desperately want to un-Christian us. The Michigan church shooting was shocking enough, but more than that was the reaction, particularly from (but not limited to) evangelical protestants. In the comments section of every news article I have seen, these “Christians” have felt it necessary to shout that “Mormons aren’t Christian,” as if the mass shooting itself is little more than a conversation starter and not a shocking tragedy. The bodies of the victims have not even been buried yet, and pastors like Mark Driscoll have been openly exploiting the shooting to promote their own anti-Mormon literature, including some (apparently AI-written) new books published just in the last week since the shooting.

They hate us. They really do hate us. And honestly, I can’t help but wonder: how many Mark Driscoll videos did this mass shooter watch before he decided to take matters into his own hands? How much money has Mark Driscoll made in the last week, because of all the clicks and engagement he’s been able to farm from this tragedy? How many more mass shooters are we going to see in coming years, because of all this anti-Mormon rhetoric? This last week, our Christian “friends” showed us exactly who and what they are. I would like to give them the benefit of the doubt, but frankly, they haven’t left me with much of that to give them.

So what is a “Christian” anyway? What is the best way to define that term? The anti-Mormons who seek to un-Christian us all go back to our rejection of the Trinity and the Nicean Creed, as if the thing that makes you “Christian” is a specific ontological belief about the nature of God (never mind that most of them cannot consistently define what the “Trinity” even is). Meanwhile, the Bible itself says “by this shall all men know that ye are my disciples, if ye have love one to another.” (John 13:35) It also says “by their fruits ye shall know them.” (Matthew 7:20) Which says a lot, when you consider how much these “Christians” hate and despise us.

But I think we can avoid the whole debate by this very simple definition: a Christian is anyone who takes the name of Christ.

“But wait!” you say. “What about everyone who worships a different Christ than I do?” To which I would point out that to some degree, every division within Christianity worships a slightly different version of Christ—even (or especially) all of the Trinitarian ones. Otherwise, we would all be of “one Lord, one faith, one baptism,” (Ephesians 4:5) as the scripture says.

“But what about someone who’s first name is ‘Christian,’ but he doesn’t even believe in God! Is he still a Christian? What is your answer to that?” To which, I would probably blink a couple of times, and ask if you heard any of the words that just came out of your mouth. Yes, a person named “Christian” is still a “Christian.” He has literally taken (or been given) the name of Christ. He might not actually believe in Christ, but he’s still a “Christian.” It’s just, that might not mean what you think it means.

It may feel overly broad, but this is the only definition that cannot be appropriated by any particular sect in order to un-Christian any of the others. Which is just as wrong for a single sect to do, as it is for all the major denominations to band together in order to exclude the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.