I just made a very interesting personal discovery, gleaned from the data on my reading of the Hugo and Nebula winning books. Of the 110 novels that have won either award, I have now read all but 16 of them, which is enough data to get some reprentative results.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
One of the best predictors that I will DNF a book is whether the author is a childless woman. Of the 18 books written by childless women, I have DNFed all but three of them (Downbelow Station<\/em> by C.J. Cherryh, which I read years ago and would probably DNF today, and Network Effect<\/em> by Martha Wells, which is a genuinely entertaining read, and Jonathan Strange & Mr. Norell<\/em> by Susanna Clarke, which I haven’t read yet). For childless men, it’s a little bit more of a crapshoot: of the 31 books written by childless men, I’ve DNFed 16 of them and read 11, but only 6 of those are books I thought were worth owning.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Conversely, one of the best predictors that I will enjoy a book is whether the author is a mother. Of the 20 books written by mothers, I have DNFed only 6 of them and read 8, all of which I think are worth owning. Of the six remaining books that I haven’t read yet, I will almost certainly finish four of them, and may finish all six. The only book by an author I haven’t already read and enjoyed is The Speed of Dark<\/em> by Elizabeth Moon, which I am currently reading and will probably finish next week.<\/p>\n\n\n\n For fathers, it’s more of a mixed bag. Of the 40 books written by fathers, I have DNFed 19 of them and read 16 (12 of which I think are worth owning). Of the five that I haven’t read yet, I’ll probably DNF at least one or two, so it’s safe to assume that there’s only a 50\/50 chance I’ll enjoy a book if it’s written by a father, a little better than if it’s written by a childless man but not by much.<\/p>\n\n\n\n So there’s something about female authors that makes me much more likely to enjoy their books if they’ve decided to have children, and much less likely to enjoy them if they haven’t. <\/p>\n\n\n\n But I have to couch this discovery by saying “one of the best,” because so far, the best predictor that I will DNF a book is whether it won a Nebula without<\/em> also winning a Hugo. Of the 31 books that have only won the Nebula, I have DNFed a whopping 23 and finished only 3 of them, none of which I thought was worth owning. Of the remaining five, however, I will probably finish at least another three of them, and all are books that I will probably decide are worth owning (Falling Free<\/em> by Lois McMaster Bujold, The Speed of Dark<\/em> by Elizabeth Moon, and Powers<\/em> by Ursula K. Le Guin\u2014all of them written by mothers). If that is the case, then the child-rearing status of the author (provided that she’s a woman) will indeed be the best predictor as to whether I’ll enjoy the book.<\/p>\n\n\n\n As for the decade in which the book came out, I’m slightly more likely to enjoy it if it was written between the mid-40s (counting retro-Hugos) and the mid-60s. From the mid-60s through the 70s, I thought almost all of the award-winning books were terrible (the only exceptions were Dune<\/em> by Frank Herbert, which is more a creation of the early 60s, and The Left Hand of Darkness<\/em> and The Dispossessed<\/em> by Ursula K. Le Guin). <\/p>\n\n\n\n I haven’t yet read all of the books that came out in the 80s and 90s, but it generally looks like a 50\/50 split, slightly favoring books from the mid-80s and disfavoring books from the late 90s. For the 00s, there isn’t enough data right now to say one way or the other. It’s the one decade left where most of the Hugo and Nebula award-winning books are still on my TBR. <\/p>\n\n\n\n But starting in 2010, the books all seem to become terrible again. The only exceptions are Blackout<\/em> and All Clear<\/em> by Connie Willis (whose heyday for the awards was really more in the 80s and 90s), The Three-Body Problem<\/em> by Cixin Liu (a Chinese author who isn’t caught up in all of the culture war baggage here in the West), and The Network Effect<\/em> by Martha Wells, which once again seems to be the exception that proves the rule.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"